Is BushCo™ Corrupt?
Am I asking a rhetorical question? Of course!
The official, Charles M. Smith, was the senior civilian overseeing the multibillion-dollar contract with KBR during the first two years of the war. Speaking out for the first time, Mr. Smith said that he was forced from his job in 2004 after informing KBR officials that the Army would impose escalating financial penalties if they failed to improve their chaotic Iraqi operations.Army auditors had determined that KBR lacked credible data or records for more than $1 billion in spending, so Mr. Smith refused to sign off on the payments to the company. “They had a gigantic amount of costs they couldn’t justify,” he said in an interview. “Ultimately, the money that was going to KBR was money being taken away from the troops, and I wasn’t going to do that.”
And what was the Army's rationale for firing Mr. Smith?
“You have to understand the circumstances at the time,” said Jeffrey P. Parsons, executive director of the Army Contracting Command. “We could not let operational support suffer because of some other things.”
Those "some other things" would seem to include a missing $1,000,000,000. As Sen. Everett Dirkson might never have said, "A billion here, a billion there, and pretty soon you're talking real money."
It should go without saying that KBR has been duly punished:
The Army also convened boards that awarded KBR high performance bonuses, according to Mr. Smith.High grades on its work in Iraq also allowed KBR to win more work from the Pentagon, and this spring, KBR was awarded a share in the new 10-year contract. The Army also announced that Serco, RCI’s parent, will help oversee the Army’s new contract with KBR.
I wonder if DeFib Dick's bank balances have grown recently.
.




