April 17, 2008

The Quiet Revolution

The HuffPo's Jason Linkins summarizes just who gives Snuffleupagus his marching orders:

The blogosphere has been up on this from jump street. On Tuesday, Democratic Underground was among the first to note that Stephanopoulos was "Taking Notes From Sean Hannity for Tomorrow Night's Debates":

Hannity asked George what kinds of questions they'll be asking at the debate tomorrow and they discussed a few things. When Hannity asked about the first question below about Ayers and whether George had plans to ask such a question, George replied, "Well, I'm taking notes now Sean." It did actually sound like he was pausing to take notes. And Hannity continued to feed him more:

1) Ask Obama about his relationship with Ayers and WeatherUnderground and Axelrod's comments, "They're friendly"

2) Ask Obama why he attended the Million Man March

Whether or not they had any advance notice of what was to transpire I have little doubt that the bigwigs in Disney's corporate offices were high-fiving each other last night (and probably in the corporate suites of Viacom, General Electric, Time-Warner, and, of course, NewsCorp). While Charlie and Stephy may have aimed most of their fire at Obama the result remains: St. John McCain was the big winner. Glennzilla notes:

National Review's Mark Hemingway excitedly declared that the winner was "McCain by a landslide." Commentary's John Podhoretz said: "Good Lord. Charlie Gibson Turns Into Larry Kudlow." Hemingway quoted one of his readers: "What's up with Charlie Gibson tonight? Especially on capital gains. He sounds downright conservative." Separately, Hemingway celebrated: "Halle-frickin'-lujah. Someone in the mainstream media finally mentions the William Ayers connection," praised Gibson for his questions about Jeremiah Wright, and the praised Gibson again for his questions to Obama about Bosnia sniper fire.

[...]

Notably, Charlie Gibson also hosted a GOP and a Democratic primary debate back in January and received rave reviews then, too . . . from the Right. The Far Right site NewsBusters heaped praised on Gibson back then for what they deemed his fairness and decency in questioning GOP candidates. So, too, did National Review's Mark Hemingway ("The Sober, Intellectual Tone of moderator Charlie Gibson and this whole ABC news production so far is very welcome"). The general consensus among Republicans in January was that Gibson did a superb job of moderating their debate, too.

Denunciations of the "Liberal Media" now ring more hollow than ever.

And a disgusted Michael Grunwald of Time writes:

Obama's memoir dripped with contempt for modern gotcha politics, for a campaign culture obsessed with substantively irrelevant but supposedly symbolic gaffes like John Kerry ordering Swiss cheese or Al Gore sighing or George H.W. Bush checking his watch or Michael Dukakis looking dorky in a tank. "What's troubling is the gap between the magnitude of our challenges and the smallness of our politics—the ease with which we are distracted by the petty and trivial," he wrote.

The "petty and trivial" is precisely what Disney/ABC wants.

I know I harp on this constantly - and I'll continue to do so - but this is the behavior we'll be seeing from the "news" media straight through to November. The corporations that control the media (and so much else) simply can't allow for the slightest possibility that the government be composed of citizens who don't bow and scrape before them.

It's a truism that the first thing done in any revolution is to seize the means of communications. This thirty-year quiet revolution - abetted by the supposed guarantors of our rights and privileges - by a corporate oligarchy has accomplished that without a shot being fired.

Pathetic.


.

February 27, 2008

Debate Debacle

I don't watch these so-called "debates" - they're not debates but simultaneous press conferences - largely because of the so-called "moderators." It looks like my aversion payed off rather well for last night's ridiculousness. digby:

Judging by their silly questions tonight, Russert and Williams obviously know nothing about health care policy, Iraq, Islamic terrorism, economics, global trade or any other subject that requires more than five minutes study to come up with some gotcha question or a stupid Jack Bauer fantasy. It's embarrassing.

These people guide the way citizens perceive politics even if the citizens don't know it. It's hard for me to see how anything can truly change until this is dealt with.

Josh Marshall:

9:24 PM ... Russert: If I don't get a yes or no answer to my clownish question, you're toast, woman!

---

9:31 PM ... Russert: I'm one hardass, Dude. You can't put anything past me.

---

9:42 PM ... I love it when Tim goes into character as an Iraqi nationalist.

---

10:08 PM ... Russert spews the Farrakhan story. Russert: Let me take a few moments to read into the record some of Farrakhan's most rancid quotes.

10:10 PM ... I guess it's good in some way that this sludge gets thrown around now in advance of the general. But Russert is well beyond the normal bounds of disgusting on this front. As a separate matter, the covert campaign to smear Obama with the Jewish community is a topic of great importance that I've been meaning to hit on and haven't done enough on it yet. At least we know now that Russert's enlisted with the cause.

---

10:33 PM ... TPM Reader MF chimes in: "It seems that Russert is asking the questions in the aspect that the candidates are guilty of something. It is really quite odd. And when did it become okay for a moderator to be an antagonist in a Presidential debate. I thought the job of a moderator was to moderate and not antagonize."

Josh also has video of Russert's most noxious moment here.

Debate (such as they are) moderators are supposed to moderate not display prosecutorial zeal or personal pique. Russert and Williams and Blitzer and King and all the other members of what Atrios calls "The Villiage" are, as Jon Stewart famously put it, "hurting America."

When are we as citizens going to stand up and say, "ENOUGH!"?


.

January 23, 2008

Another Shock!

Via CREW, the Democratic House leadership caves again:

House Democrats will postpone votes on criminal contempt citations against White House chief of staff Joshua Bolten and former White House counsel Harriet Miers, while congressional leaders work with President Bush on a bipartisan stimulus package to fend off an economic downturn, according to party leaders and leadership aides.

Senior Democrats have decided that holding a controversial vote on the contempt citations, which have already been approved by the House Judiciary Committee as part of its investigation into the firing of nine U.S. attorneys, would “step on their message” of bipartisan unity in the midst of the stimulus package talks. [Emphasis added.]

And not even a Sternly Worded Letter™ this time.

Prediction: In the spirit of Bipartisan Unity the Republicans will steamroller the Dems.

Greenwald:

So it is important to note that [the Democrats] are fearless in some respects -- such as when it comes to forcing famous baseball players to make exciting appearances before them so they can "investigate" the grave matter of whether, as this blogger put it, "a man who is already a far outlier on the curve of human physical development wishes to shrink his balls and grow his boobs in order to swat a ball farther and with more frequency," all as part of "a situation where a collection of superhuman genetic freaks perform feats of unimaginable speed and strength for our amusement."

True, that.


.

October 24, 2007

And On It Rolls...

More flat-earthism from BushCo™:

The White House severely edited congressional testimony given Tuesday by the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on the impact of climate change on health, removing specific scientific references to potential health risks, according to two sources familiar with the documents. [Emphasis added.]

[...]

"It was eviscerated," said a CDC official, familiar with both versions, who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitive nature of the review process.

The official said that while it is customary for testimony to be changed in a White House review, these changes were particularly "heavy-handed," with the document cut from its original 14 pages to four. It was six pages as presented to the Senate committee.

We can't have actual, y'know, facts and data. They might cut into somebody's profits. And facts and data will prevent the triumphant return of the Baby Jesus!

It's just another day in BushCheney's America.


.

October 09, 2007

Idiots In Action

Stoller:

I just flipped on MSNBC, and Chris Matthews is saying that he doesn't mind accused of being wrong or accused of being unfair, but he bristles at being accused of lacking independent.
"I've gotten it from the left-wing blogs and the right-wing blogs every day of my life for the last twenty years."

Blogs were created in 2001. Ah, the Village.

This is one of the people who decides what's acceptable discourse.


.

October 03, 2007

"My job is a decision-making job. And as a result, I make a lot of decisions."

It gets worse.


.