Speaking Of Crazy People

Another issue for the presidential candidates to deal with:

This loophole has not been lost on the life forms who arrived on these shores aboard flying saucers with little more than the antennae on their backs. After years of suffering without suffrage, these beings are now seeking to play a role in the 2008 presidential campaign.

That, at any rate, is the considered opinion of the Paradigm Research Group, which held a news conference at the National Press Club yesterday to demand that presidential candidates support a "truth amnesty" to end the "government-imposed truth embargo on the facts confirming an extraterrestrial presence."

"The truth amnesty disclosure project is reportedly recommended by the participating extraterrestrials themselves," Alfred Webre of the Institute for Cooperation in Space announced to the humans-only gathering, next door to a speech on Iraq by Rep. Jack Murtha. "That is the specific extraterrestrial civilization which approximately 60 years ago entered into a top-secret CIA human-extraterrestrial liaison program."

[...]

"Let me check in with the mothership," Phil Singer, a Hillary Clinton spokesman, answered when asked about the truth embargo.

I am 100% against giving space aliens the vote. And for a very good reason:

.

Comments

[brian]

Alfred Webre was on the faculty of a major US university when approached by then President Jimmy Carter to give a serious look into the ET issue. Other arms of the government threatened to pull funding and projects from this school if the proposed study were to continue. Webre is on Bassett's team now.

Government and military witnesses testify that captured ET technologies represent the most dangerous weapons up the government's sleeve. On the other hand, their technology, if used for good would reverse all of our environmental problems, and would balance out power in the whole world, making oil unnecessary and reversing the damage currently being done to our planet.

It is a common and well-traveled road to poke fun at this issue. I respect your right to label however your choose whatever you think is odd.

The reality is, however, given the implications, we would be crazy not to look into this important issue.

[spork_incident]

Evidence?

Peer-reviewed, thank you.

No?

I thought as much.

.

[Brian]

Well, think again, or keep your eyes closed.